ARGUMENTATIVENESS OF UTTERANCES OF INDIGNATION

The article deals with the study of emotional arguments used by indignant speakers. Indignation is viewed as a negative mental state that arises result person’s strong discontent, his/her anger, and disgust towards those events actions other people have happened or are happening in environment. A person experiences indignation when he/she evaluates unfair. along emotions, such frustration, resentment, disappointment, associated censure – utterances disapproval one’s deeds, actions, etc. In everyday life, terms “criticizing”, “rebuking”, “finding fault”, “blaming”, “questioning judgment decision”, “demanding explanations”, “disagreement” to denote censure. Speakers choose following four ways expressing censure: 1) direct rebuke; 2) demanding explanations; 3) implying moral intellectual inferiority someone; 4) surprise disgust. One strategies communication argumentation, which takes place grounds statement provided. Argumentation can include reasonings, context involves difference opinion, at same time, these reasonings certain structure, namely, thesis supporting arguments. Trying be persuasive, addressant appeals feelings addressee. During represents point view addressant, who tries convince addressee its soundness. speaker uses rhetorical questions expressive means.